Example (5.3): Effect of girders on the raft rigidity
Introduction
The foundation is considered as rigid, elastic or flexible,
depends on the ratio between the rigidity of the foundation and the soil. The oldest work for
the analysis of foundation rigidity is that of
Borowicka (1939). He analyzed the
problem of distribution of contact stress under uniformly loaded strip and circular rigid foundations
resting on semi-infinite elastic mass.
After Borowicka’s
analysis, many authors introduced formulae to find the foundation rigidity for plates resting on different subsoil models. For
examples, Gorbunov/
Posadov
(1959) introduced formula for an elastic solid medium.
Cheung/
Zienkiewicz
(1965) introduced formulae for Winkler springs and isotropic elastic half
space model. Vlazov/
Leontiv
(1966) introduced formula for a two-parameter elastic medium. A
good review for those formulae may be found in
Selvadurai (1979).
Lately, based on great number of comparative computations
for the modulus of compressibility method, Graßhoff
(1987) proposed various degrees of
system rigidity between foundation and the soil until case of practical rigidity using Equation
(5.2). The equation still used in many national standard specifications such as German standard (DIN
4018) and Egyptian Code of Practice (ECP
196-1995).
Description of the problem
Ribbed raft may be used for many structures have heavy loads
or large spans, if a flat level for the first floor is not required. Consequently, concrete is
reduced. Such structures are silos and elevated tanks. In spite of this type of foundation has many
disadvantages if used in normally buildings, still used by many designers. Such disadvantages
are the raft needs deep foundation level under the ground surface, fill material on the
foundation to make a flat level and an additional slab on the fill material to construct the first
floor. The use of the ribbed raft relates to the simplicity of analysis by hand calculations.
First, both of the two rafts with and without ribs are
clearly saves and correct, but there is still a question, whose one of the two types is more rigid? To
answer this question the following example is presented. Consider the foundation of an elevated tank may be designed
for both types of foundations. The foundation has the dimensions of 20 [m] * 20 [m], transmits
equal loads for all 25 columns, each of 1000 [kN]. The loads give average contact pressure
on soil qav
= 62.5 [kN/m ]. Columns are equally spaced, 4 m apart, in each direction as shown in
the Figure. |